Half of checked chemicals unsafe in current commercial use

– Cancer and other harms, but no action yet for 74% of danger substances

– Unreliable industry data stalls safety checks for nearly 2 out of 3 priority chemicals

– Hundreds remain unchecked due to lack of resources


This story was covered in Spiegel, Falter, Trouw, Publico, Il Fatto Quotidiano, Rzeczpospolita, Standaard, Politiken, Mediapart, Europapress, Kathimerini


2 April, Brussels – Officials are failing to prevent dozens of dangerous chemicals being used in consumer and other products, according to a review of action by European governments.

Around 22,000 chemicals are registered for use in Europe. National authorities began in-depth safety checks of hundreds of substances thought to have dangerous properties in March 2012. By December 2018, high quality checks were completed on 94 substances, of which nearly half (49% or 46) were declared to be unsafe in their current commercial use. The 46 danger substances have been listed for the first time in a review of official records by the European Environmental Bureau.

Agents judged the 46 substances a danger due to their harmful properties and exposure threat to people or the environment. They concluded that protective action is needed in all cases, but no action has yet been taken to control 74% (34) of the 46. Lack of resources is a major cause of inaction, NGOs have been told. Industry is legally permitted to use millions of tonnes of the 34 substances annually. The resulting exposure is likely causing cancer, fertility problems or other health impacts, or creating serious environmental pollution, officials found.

The programme of in-depth checks by member state officials, known substance evaluation under a programme called CoRAP, is significantly off course, with just 94 of 352 (26.7%) cases completed by December 2018. This is largely because officials are given inadequate data by chemical companies. Firms are required by EU law to provide high quality safety data. When they do, cases are resolved within a year. But agents had to order companies to produce more data in 64% of cases since 2012, the records show. Companies generally responded quickly to requests. But once triggered, the data request and review process typically takes 7-9 years to conclude. It afterwards typically takes a further 5-7 years for officials to take action to control a substance, which could include a ban. So once officials suspect a substance is unsafe for current uses and prioritise it for evaluation, it could legally be used to make products for up to 16 years before it is finally brought under control by regulators.

Among the hundreds of suspected dangerous substances still waiting for in-depth checks to be completed is Titanium dioxide, widely used in consumer products, but suspected of being carcinogenic and mutagenic. Scheduled for checks in 2013, they remains incomplete while exposure continues. Another is Triphenyl phosphate, a flame retardant and suspected endocrine disrupter found in high concentrations in cars, classrooms, living rooms and offices. It was prioritised for checks in 2013, but postponed 4 years in a row.

Throughout the EU REACH chemical control process, very high levels of poor quality and missing data from industry is found. A 2018 progress report by the European Chemicals Agency found that 74% of dossiers had “important safety information” missing under compliance check. “The numbers show a similar picture to previous years” the report said. In 2018, a three year investigation by German authorities found that only a third of substances produced above 1,000 tonnes met the legally mandated safety information. The European Commission has acknowledged the problems and called for thorough reforms.

Global chemicals sales more than doubled between 2004 and 2014, are expected to double again by 2030 and quadruple by 2060. Some 60 percent (by tonnage) of the chemicals on the European market are considered hazardous for health and the environment, according to a report (page 17) for the European Commission. Babies born today are described as “pre-polluted” with a cocktail of chemicals. We all have over 300 manmade chemicals in our bodies that our great grandparents did not. Many substances used to make everyday consumer products are linked to modern epidemics such as diabetes, breast and prostate cancer. Of the 100,000 chemicals used in Europe today, “only a small fraction has been thoroughly evaluated by authorities regarding their health and environmental properties and impacts, and even fewer are actually regulated,” according to a report for the European Commission. Official polls consistently find that Europeans are concerned about chemical exposure.

Today, the United Nations begins three days of talks aimed at finalising chemical safety goals by 2020. Europe committed to these voluntary goals, but the European Commission has acknowledged it will fail these (page 64). The EEB review provides further evidence of this.

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) is Europe’s largest network of environmental organisations.

EEB chemicals policy manager Tatiana Santos said:

“This is very concerning. Millions of tonnes of dangerous substances are being used unsafely in consumer and other products and getting into the environment. It can take over a decade for officials to protect us, largely because companies fail to provide sufficient safety information. Is it really too much to expect good data from an industry worth €500 billion a year in Europe? It claims safety is a priority. The facts suggest it is not.

“It is clear the EU system lets chemicals onto the market too easily and then struggles to get the genie back in the bottle. Companies should face a much higher bar to market entry and also face losing market access if their data is found to be shaky, as is so often the case. For their part, officials need to chemical safety a much higher priority. This year’s elections are a golden opportunity for the EU to get serious about protecting us from chemical exposure.”

The EEB called on officials to stop blacking out the names of non-compliant companies in their reports, carry out more checks and speed up their work, among other demands.


Image credit: Rawpixel

For more information:

EEB chemicals policy manager Tatiana Santos (ES / EN / FR) tatiana.santos@eeb.org +32 488 918 597

EEB communications officer Jack Hunter (EN) jack.hunter@eeb.org

Report author, Dr Helene Loonen helene.loonen@eeb.org

Half of checked chemicals unsafe in current commercial use
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using this website you agree to our Data Protection Policy.
Read more