Climate justice means social justice

Global and swift action is needed at COP27!

Sign the petition

Chemical detox plan for Europe announced

Stacks of old oil tanks for background and texture.

Major reforms could rapidly reduce chemical pollution

 

NGOs welcome action on “serious and growing” threat

 

Ban for PFAS, the ever-lasting poison in drinking water

 

14 October 2020, Brussels – Plans for the biggest upgrade of chemical safety laws in over a decade were announced by the European Commission today. 

Europe already has the world’s strictest chemical safety laws, but they are slow, poorly implemented and failing to curb rising chemical production and pollution, most of it toxic.

The Commission communication outlines future action in some detail, but actual legal reform proposals are expected to follow in the coming months and years. Environmental, consumer and health NGOs welcomed the plans, which have the potential to rapidly phase-out vast amounts of toxic substances that are building up in European homes, workplaces and environment. Some 100,000 substances are used in Europe, 74% hazardous (see Roadmap). Daily exposure to a mix of toxic substances is linked to rising health, fertility, developmental threats, as well as the collapse and ultimately extinction of insect, bird and mammal populations, threats today acknowledged by the Commission. The last dedicated EU poll showed two thirds of Europeans are concerned about being exposed to hazardous chemicals.

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) is the largest network of environmental organisations in Europe.

EEB chemicals policy manager Tatiana Santos said: “We warmly welcome this toxic-free environment strategy and its zero pollution goal because we face a serious and growing threat from an invisible enemy. Poll after poll shows the public is clearly and rightly concerned about harmful man-made chemicals polluting their homes, offices and environment, slowly and quietly sickening too many of them and their relatives. The EU is listening to that concern. It now needs to turn this template, this declaration of intent, into action. Similar pledges have gone nowhere in the past, but the Von der Leyen Commission is building a results-oriented reputation. We cannot afford years more ‘paralysis by analysis’ from officials.

“Today should be a watershed moment for all those backward-looking chemical companies to embrace rather than continue resisting progress. They are certainly going to be offered enough financial carrots to do so, though still no financial sticks to force polluters to pay.

We look forward to working together with all European institutions, to ensure that the strategy delivers and that the committed actions are implemented as soon as possible.”

 

 

What will change? EEB welcomes:

Finally, the most toxic chemicals will be progressively banned from consumer products. Any substance that causes cancer, genetic mutation, affects the reproductive or the endocrine system, has persistent or bioaccumulative properties as well as chemicals affecting the immune, neurological or respiratory systems and chemicals toxic to a specific organ properties will no longer be allowed in products such as food packaging, toys, childcare products, cosmetics, detergents, furniture and textiles.

Faster action promised on worrisome endocrine disrupting chemicals, following a pledge from 1999. A ban on PFAS, a ‘forever chemicals’ threat to drinking water now present in almost all living creatures on the planet.

Acknowledgement that safety and environmental sustainability is the future for European industry. Practically speaking, this promises to flip the focus of EU legislation away from ‘safe’ use of harmful chemicals we see today to avoiding their use in the first place. There will also be support for a transition towards safer and greener substances and technologies.

Greatly increased checks on chemical safety and “zero tolerance for non-compliance”, meaning access to market chemicals revoked if found non-compliant. Today, vast numbers are non-compliant.

Clean recycling as a rule. Important to counter the growing volumes of harmful chemicals building up in waste streams and ending up back in products. A powerful new product policy will block harmful chemicals in products at creation.

A stop to exports of chemicals that are banned but still made and exported from Europe. 

 

EEB regrets:

There is no absolute target to reduce chemical production, despite massive predicted growth, most of it toxic.

The polluters still won’t pay. NGOs fear large amounts of public money will go to industry to shift to safer chemical production, while there will still be no tax on the use of harmful substances or fees to monitor pollution or clean polluted environments and drinking water. The public would never pay to stop dangerous drivers on the road when the law can achieve a public good for free. The public pays billions of Euros in health costs while the chemical industry is owned by some of Europe’s richest and most politically powerful men.

Paralysis by analysis is an industry tactic pioneered by big tobacco lobbyists. Industry has successfully won a blanket requirement for impact assessments in all EU legislation. This will effectively smother all areas of the chemical strategy, introducing delays typically lasting at least a year. The Commission has committed to complete delivery of the chemical strategy by 2024. This means the strategy might achieve nothing by 2024.

Workers have been largely ignored today, despite the fact cancer is the leading cause of work-related death and most are caused by just 10 substances.

No clear measures against dodgy data. Industry selects which toxicity data for their products are given to regulators and often reject studies published by independent scientists that show harm. Regulators agreed independent data is a priority in the summer, but we saw no progress today.

Micro action on nanomaterials. Despite these substances having intrinsically unstable and concerning properties, we will remain largely blind about which nanomaterials, where and how much they are used. All EU institutions call for change, but the Commission follows an industry demand to ‘go-slow’.