A new report from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and its member organisations reveals widespread PFAS contamination in wild fish across Europe, with many samples far exceeding proposed new safety limits. These so-called “forever chemicals” pose a growing threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems – yet EU Member States are pushing to delay action on needed pollution controls until 2039.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n
The EEB briefing, <\/span>\u201cForever chemicals poisoning Europe\u2019s waters and fish: The tip of the PFAS iceberg,\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/a> analyses monitoring data from Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Sweden. It shows that most fish samples tested between 2009 and 2023 contained dangerous levels of PFOS, a persistent PFAS identified as possibly carcinogenic for humans.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Key findings:<\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This <\/span>analysis<\/span><\/a> only covers one PFAS chemical \u2013 PFOS \u2013 while new EU proposals would target a group of 24, suggesting the scale of contamination is likely far greater.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Outdated EU rules are masking the true extent of the crisis.<\/b>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Member States are currently only required to monitor PFOS, and not the thousands of other harmful PFAS chemicals. A 2022 proposal from the EU Commission to update EU water pollution laws, including regulating a group of PFAS in coastal and freshwater, including biota, has faced several delays, with governments now seeking to push compliance until <\/span>2039 <\/b>\u2013 potentially wasting more than a decade of action in the urgent fight against toxic pollution.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The EEB is calling for immediate EU-level action to protect nature and public health from pollution. The next key moment: EU institutions meet on <\/span>23 September<\/b> to decide the future of Europe\u2019s water pollution standards.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Sara Johansson and Ath\u00e9na\u00efs Georges, EEB said:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n “PFAS pollution of EU waters and its wildlife is widespread, yet badly underreported. Coherent obligations on Member States to act to limit further water pollution, e.g. by putting in place stricter discharge permits for industry are urgently needed. We urge the EU institutions to stop delaying action and to adopt updated EU water pollution standards, with a binding obligation for Member States to include measures to limit further pollution from PFAS and other priority pollutants in the next River Basin Management Plans.”<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Kildine Le Proux de La Rivi\u00e8re, G\u00e9n\u00e9rations Futures, said:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWe need stringent regulations and political will to stop the accumulation of PFAS in our <\/span><\/i> environment. Unfortunately, PFOS is only one of the many PFAS substances that <\/span><\/i> accumulate in water, soil and throughout the food chain with worrying impacts on the health of Europeans who are more exposed to cancer and liver toxicity. Other PFAS such as TFA are also present at significant rates and must be limited as quickly as possible.\u201d<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Koldo Hern\u00e1ndez Lozano and Kisti\u00f1e Garc\u00eda, Ecologistas en Acci\u00f3n, said:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n “The high level of PFAS contamination detected in Spain, despite the small number of monitoring points and the limited number of samples analysed, and despite only one PFAS substance being evaluated, clearly indicates that urgent measures must be taken to reduce contamination. The risk to human health posed by this type of contamination cannot be ignored; taking effective action is not an option, it is a duty”.<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n ENDS\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n ____<\/span><\/p>\n Notes to editors<\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n