{"id":117428,"date":"2025-03-25T11:53:46","date_gmt":"2025-03-25T10:53:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/?p=117428"},"modified":"2025-03-25T11:53:46","modified_gmt":"2025-03-25T10:53:46","slug":"new-report-unwraps-solutions-for-eu-countries-to-end-the-packaging-waste-crisis-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/new-report-unwraps-solutions-for-eu-countries-to-end-the-packaging-waste-crisis-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Critical Raw Materials: Strategic Projects Selection Bypasses Civil Society"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Today, the EU Commission presented its long-awaited list of strategic projects under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. The EU Raw Materials Coalition expresses serious concerns regarding the European Commission\u2019s lack of transparency in the selection of these mining-related Strategic Projects, raising critical issues related to accountability, human rights, Indigenous rights, and public participation.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>While the EU aims to meet Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) targets and diversify supply, the current selection process risks ignoring the rights of affected communities and potentially triggering anti-mining protests. The EU must uphold its core values\u2014human rights, international law, and environmental responsibility\u2014in its raw materials policies, particularly within these strategic projects.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Robin Roels<\/strong>, Coordinator of the <a href=\"https:\/\/eurmc.org\/\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/eurmc.org\/\">EU Raw Materials Coalition<\/a>, raises concerns that the lack of transparency in the process undermines not only democratic oversight but also\u00a0put into question the EU\u2019s commitments under the Aarhus Convention:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong><em>\u201cThe opaque selection of Strategic Projects severely undermines public trust in the EU\u2019s critical raw materials strategy. If the EU is serious about a fair and sustainable transition, it must open up this process to genuine scrutiny and ensure that community voices are heard.\u00a0Civil society, Indigenous Peoples, affected local communities, and independent experts have been largely excluded from the decision-making process, leaving the assessment and prioritisation of projects unclear. Despite repeated requests, the full list of project applicants and the evaluation criteria remain undisclosed.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Furthermore, the right of Indigenous Peoples to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) is being consistently sidelined.\u00a0<strong>Yblin Rom\u00e1n Escobar<\/strong>, Policy Advisor of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sirgecoalition.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.sirgecoalition.org\/\">SIRGE Coalition<\/a> said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>\u201cWith 54% of energy transition minerals located on or near Indigenous lands, the EU must ensure that Indigenous Peoples\u2019 rights to self-determination and FPIC are fully respected\u2014both within and beyond Europe\u2019s borders.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Beyond transparency issues, corporate accountability remains a critical issue.\u00a0<strong>Johanna Sydow<\/strong>, head of the International Environmental Policy Division of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.boell.de\/en\">Heinrich B\u00f6ll Foundation<\/a> said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>\u201cDuring the negotiations of the legislative process of the Critical Raw Materials Act concerns about too weak human rights and environmental standards were silenced with reference to Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. However, the Omnibus Package recently proposed by the EU Commission significantly weakens this minimal criteria for imports within the raw materials sector. This is particularly alarming given the sector\u2019s history and poses a long term threat to human and national security. This weakening undermines the EU\u2019s credibility in pursuing high standards.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Without strong safeguards, Strategic Projects risk enabling human rights abuses, Indigenous rights violations, and environmental harm, especially in regions with weak governance. The EU-Rwanda partnership controversy serves as a stark reminder of the reputational damage caused by bypassing due diligence in mining. The current list appears to prioritise extraction over long-term solutions. Without focusing on material efficiency and demand reduction, the EU risks deepening resource dependency instead of enabling a just, resilient transition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>*** ENDS ***<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today, the EU Commission presented its long-awaited list of strategic projects under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. The EU Raw Materials Coalition expresses serious concerns<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":113558,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[718,3,4,144],"tags":[582,681],"class_list":["post-117428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-transition","category-news","category-press-release","category-homepage","tag-eu-critical-raw-material-strategy","tag-raw-materials"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/raychan-1ZOG9CSKFg8-unsplash.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/76"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117428\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/113558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/hr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}