{"id":109380,"date":"2023-01-19T16:02:27","date_gmt":"2023-01-19T15:02:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/?page_id=109380"},"modified":"2025-10-17T11:40:31","modified_gmt":"2025-10-17T09:40:31","slug":"nuclear-energy","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/work-areas\/climate-change\/false-solutions\/","title":{"rendered":"False Solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Europe\u2019s climate crisis leaves no room for distractions. Yet, under the banner of \u201ctechnological neutrality\u201d, powerful industrial lobbies are pushing costly, risky, or unproven technologies to gain equal footing with renewables and energy efficiency in public funding and political attention.<\/h4>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">If Europe is serious about reaching climate neutrality by 2050, or sooner, it must prioritise <strong data-start=\"1059\" data-end=\"1091\">the best available solutions <\/strong>to ditch fossil fuels: energy savings, renewables, electrification, and circularity. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Betting on costly experiments or overhyped technologies -such as new nuclear plants, oversized hydrogen plans, or uncertain carbon capture and storage projects- risks prolonging fossil fuel dependence, wasting the time we don\u2019t have, and diverting scarce public resources.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4>Nuclear Power<\/h4>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">The European Commission\u2019s decision to label nuclear power and fossil gas as \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/meta.eeb.org\/2022\/01\/27\/eu-cash-floodgates-open-for-nuclear-and-gas\/\">sustainable<\/a>\u201d investments under the EU Taxonomy critically undermines its credibility. Nuclear energy comes with severe safety, waste, and economic drawbacks that make it incompatible with a rapid and just energy transition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The EEB advocates for an <strong data-start=\"1658\" data-end=\"1686\">exit from nuclear energy<\/strong> by avoiding new investments and phasing out existing reactors at the end of their technical lifetimes. Nuclear projects take decades to build and absorb vast sums of public money, time and resources that should instead accelerate what is proving to reduce emissions fast and affordably: renewable deployment, energy efficiency, and grid upgrades.<\/p>\n<p>Building on the Paris Agreement-compatible (PAC) scenario, we <a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/library\/nuclear-phase-out-how-renewables-energy-savings-and-flexibility-can-replace-nuclear-in-europe\/\">find<\/a> that Europe can phase out nuclear by 2040, alongside fossil fuels, without compromising climate goals. Nuclear waste poses a long-term environmental and ethical burden for countless generations. Meanwhile, the technology\u2019s contribution to Europe\u2019s energy mix is already small and declining.<\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">EEB is a member of <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nuclear-transparency-watch.eu\/\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Nuclear Transparency Watch<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\"> and contributes to its activities.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4>Hydrogen<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"2367\" data-end=\"2729\">Hydrogen will play a <strong data-start=\"2387\" data-end=\"2413\">limited, targeted role<\/strong> in decarbonising sectors that are genuinely hard to electrify &#8211; such as certain industrial processes and long-distance shipping. However, the EU\u2019s current hydrogen plans are <strong data-start=\"2588\" data-end=\"2611\">massively oversized<\/strong> and risk draining financial and renewable energy resources away from faster, cheaper, and more effective solutions. Even so-called \u201cgreen\u201d hydrogen demands vast amounts of renewable electricity, which should first decarbonise the grid and end fossil fuel use.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"728\" data-end=\"1132\">In our <a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/library\/policy-brief-a-sustainable-hydrogen-strategy-for-the-eu\/\">policy brief<\/a> on renewables-based hydrogen, we outline the <strong data-start=\"791\" data-end=\"832\">environmental and economic challenges<\/strong> of large-scale hydrogen production and provide policy recommendations based on the Paris Agreement-compatible (PAC) scenario. Renewable hydrogen must be <strong data-start=\"990\" data-end=\"1013\">strictly additional<\/strong>, relying on new renewable capacity rather than competing with the rest of the energy system for limited solar and wind power.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1134\" data-end=\"1465\">To play a constructive role, hydrogen policy should focus on <strong data-start=\"1195\" data-end=\"1221\">no-regret applications<\/strong>, such as certain industrial feedstocks, and support <strong data-start=\"1274\" data-end=\"1315\">dedicated, small-scale infrastructure<\/strong> where it is truly indispensable. Overreliance on hydrogen risks slowing the transition and giving fossil and nuclear interests a new lease of life.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1134\" data-end=\"1465\">Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"4078\" data-end=\"4329\">CCS has long been promoted as a \u201csilver bullet\u201d for industrial decarbonisation. In reality, it has failed to deliver meaningful emissions reductions and mainly serves to justify further fossil fuel extraction through so-called enhanced oil recovery.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"4331\" data-end=\"4726\">CCS is <strong data-start=\"4338\" data-end=\"4384\">expensive, energy-intensive, and uncertain <\/strong>&#8211; and its widespread deployment would divert hundreds of billions of euros from more effective solutions. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) estimates that Europe\u2019s current CCS pipeline could cost as much as \u20ac520 billion and require \u20ac140 billion in public subsidies, to capture only a fraction of emissions.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"4728\" data-end=\"5059\">In our <a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/library\/ccs-reality-check-risks-and-priorities\/\">policy brief<\/a>, we show why Europe should prioritise <strong data-start=\"4324\" data-end=\"4431\">circular economy strategies, material efficiency, fossil-free industrial processes, and electrification<\/strong> instead. These solutions can decarbonise industries once seen as \u201chard to abate\u201d, such as steel and cement, faster, cheaper, and without locking in fossil fuel infrastructure.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"4728\" data-end=\"5059\">The way foward<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"5324\" data-end=\"5530\">Europe cannot afford technological neutrality. It must be <strong data-start=\"5382\" data-end=\"5409\">strategically selective<\/strong>, focusing public and private resources on the solutions that can deliver rapid, just, and irreversible emissions cuts:<\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"5532\" data-end=\"5694\">\n<li data-start=\"5532\" data-end=\"5559\">\n<p data-start=\"5534\" data-end=\"5559\">Energy efficiency first.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"5560\" data-end=\"5589\">\n<p data-start=\"5562\" data-end=\"5589\">Renewable energy at scale.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"5590\" data-end=\"5652\">\n<p data-start=\"5592\" data-end=\"5652\">Direct electrification of heating, transport, and industry.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"5653\" data-end=\"5694\">\n<p data-start=\"5655\" data-end=\"5694\">Circular economy and demand reduction.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Europe\u2019s climate crisis leaves no room for distractions. Yet, under the banner of \u201ctechnological neutrality\u201d, powerful industrial lobbies are pushing costly, risky, or unproven technologies to<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"author":45,"featured_media":109381,"parent":245,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-109380","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/109380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/45"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/109380\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/245"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/109381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}