{"id":91297,"date":"2018-04-18T09:58:05","date_gmt":"2018-04-18T07:58:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eeb.org\/?p=91297"},"modified":"2018-04-24T11:15:30","modified_gmt":"2018-04-24T09:15:30","slug":"business-as-usual-for-waste-incineration-as-updated-eu-protections-match-or-weaken-existing-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/business-as-usual-for-waste-incineration-as-updated-eu-protections-match-or-weaken-existing-guidelines\/","title":{"rendered":"Business as usual for waste incineration as \u2018updated\u2019 EU protections match or weaken existing guidelines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>A three-year process to update EU environmental standards for waste incineration plants could be about to lead to new rules that most currently operating facilities already comply with. The latest draft even weakens some key protections compared to existing guidelines, a report published today reveals.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Wasted Opportunity? EU environmental standards for waste incineration plants under review<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019 also contains a scorecard revealing the position taken by national government representatives during the drafting process. \u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While <\/span><b>the Netherlands, Sweden, Austria and Belgium are commended<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> for their efforts to raise standards, <\/span><b>Germany, the UK, Spain, Portugal, Hungary and the Czech Republic are condemned for their efforts to weaken the new rules<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EEB Technical Expert Aliki Kriekouki, who has taken part in working group meetings that provided advice to those drafting the rules said:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b><i>\u201cPeople in Europe expect the EU to have the world\u2019s best environmental standards, yet after three years of work to update the rules for waste incineration, we\u2019re stuck with a proposal that makes some progress but falls short of boosting the deployment of effective, readily available technologies that prevent or minimise harmful pollution.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><i>\u201cFor air pollution, maximum emissions levels have largely remained unchanged, with the levels of some critical pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and mercury being raised compared to the existing guidance. Sadly, especially for people living near these plants, it\u2019s a clear cut case of one step forward, two steps back.\u201d<\/i><\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) is Europe\u2019s largest network of environmental citizens\u2019 organisations with around 140 organisations in more than 30 countries.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">More than 80 million tons of waste is burnt in Europe every year, which campaigners warn is incompatible with the aim of moving to \u00a0\u2018circular economy\u2019 &#8211; where waste is prevented and products reused or recycled.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Waste incineration plants are responsible for toxic emissions of health-harming substances including dioxins, heavy metals and particulate matter known to cause respiratory diseases, cancers, immune system damage and reproductive and developmental problems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The EU sets minimum binding standards for industry as part of the Industrial Emissions Directive. Standards documents are known as \u2018BREFs\u2019. Along with industry and Member State representatives the EEB takes part in a consultation process that informs the European Commission while drafting these standards.[1]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The current draft proposals for an updated Waste Incineration BREF to replace the last one adopted in 2006 have been under development for almost three years and will likely not need to be complied with until 2024.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To download: <\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/eeb.org\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php?juwpfisadmin=false&amp;action=wpfd&amp;task=file.download&amp;wpfd_category_id=59&amp;wpfd_file_id=91296&amp;token=446c90cb489952bd3076ec8e42346c79&amp;preview=1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018A wasted opportunity? EU environmental standards for waste incineration plants under review\u2019 report<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>[wpfd_single_file id=&#8221;91296&#8243; catid =&#8221;59&#8243; name =&#8221;Report on EU environmental standards for waste incineration plants under review&#8221;]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Notes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">[1] For more information about BREFs (Best Available Technique Reference Documents) and the process to draft them, please see: <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.eipie.eu\/the-sevilla-process\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">http:\/\/www.eipie.eu\/the-sevilla-process<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A three-year process to update EU environmental standards for waste incineration plants could be about to lead to new rules that most currently operating facilities already<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":1043,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[132,128,3,4],"tags":[328,149,327,49],"class_list":["post-91297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industrial-emissions","category-industry-health","category-news","category-press-release","tag-bref","tag-industrial-emissions","tag-sevilla-process","tag-waste-recycling"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/Industrial-Emissions-13-web.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91297\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}