{"id":102565,"date":"2020-10-14T18:27:22","date_gmt":"2020-10-14T16:27:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/?p=102565"},"modified":"2021-11-22T11:28:43","modified_gmt":"2021-11-22T10:28:43","slug":"chemical-detox-plan-for-europe-announced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/chemical-detox-plan-for-europe-announced\/","title":{"rendered":"Chemical detox plan for Europe announced"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Major reforms could rapidly reduce chemical pollution<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NGOs welcome action on \u201cserious and growing\u201d threat<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">Ban for PFAS, the ever-lasting poison in drinking water<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><b>14 October 2020, Brussels &#8211; <\/b>Plans for the biggest upgrade of chemical safety laws in over a decade were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/commission\/presscorner\/detail\/en\/ip_20_1839\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">announced<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by the European Commission today.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Europe already has the world\u2019s strictest chemical safety laws, but they are slow, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/named-major-brands-breaking-eu-chemical-safety-law\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">poorly<\/span><\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/press-release-sev-report\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">implemented<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and failing to curb <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ThoBaSwe\/status\/1090508661787631616\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">rising<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> chemical production and pollution, most of it toxic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Commission <a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/environment\/strategy\/chemicals-strategy_en\">communication<\/a> outlines future action in some detail, but actual legal reform proposals are expected to follow in the coming months and years. Environmental, consumer and health NGOs welcomed the plans, which have the potential to rapidly phase-out vast amounts of toxic substances that are building up in European homes, workplaces and environment. Some 100,000 substances are used in Europe, 74% hazardous (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/info\/law\/better-regulation\/have-your-say\/initiatives\/12264-Chemicals-strategy-for-sustainability-\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">see Roadmap<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">). Daily exposure to a mix of toxic substances is linked to rising <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.who.int\/ipcs\/publications\/chemicals-public-health-impact\/en\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">health<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC6396757\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">fertility<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/laneur\/article\/PIIS1474-4422(13)70278-3\/fulltext\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">developmental<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> threats, as well as the collapse and ultimately extinction of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2017\/oct\/18\/warning-of-ecological-armageddon-after-dramatic-plunge-in-insect-numbers\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">insect, bird<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2018\/sep\/27\/orca-apocalypse-half-of-killer-whales-doomed-to-die-from-pollution\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">mammal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> populations, threats today <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?qid=1561530857605&amp;uri=COM:2019:264:FIN\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">acknowledged<\/span> <\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">by the Commission. The last dedicated EU <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/commfrontoffice\/publicopinion\/index.cfm\/Survey\/getSurveyDetail\/instruments\/SPECIAL\/surveyKy\/2111\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">poll<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> showed two thirds of Europeans are concerned about being exposed to hazardous chemicals.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) is the largest network of environmental organisations in Europe. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>EEB chemicals policy manager Tatiana Santos said:<\/strong> <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cWe warmly welcome this toxic-free environment strategy and its zero pollution goal because we face a serious and growing threat from an invisible enemy. Poll after poll shows the public is clearly and rightly concerned about harmful man-made chemicals polluting their homes, offices and environment, slowly and quietly sickening too many of them and their relatives. The EU is listening to that concern. It now needs to turn this template, this declaration of intent, into action. Similar pledges have gone nowhere in the past, but the Von der Leyen Commission is building a results-oriented reputation. We cannot afford years more \u2018paralysis by analysis\u2019 from officials.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cToday should be a watershed moment for all those backward-looking chemical companies to embrace rather than continue resisting progress. They are certainly going to be offered enough financial carrots to do so, though still no financial sticks to force polluters to pay.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c<\/span><\/i><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We look forward to working together with all European institutions, to ensure that the strategy delivers and that the committed actions are implemented as soon as possible.\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">This is such incredible news. I am so grateful to the European Union for listening the science and opening their hearts to the story of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RobertBilott?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@RobertBilott<\/a>. Governments can be responsive and do what\u2019s right for people! Bravo. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/giNbGBBvRK\">https:\/\/t.co\/giNbGBBvRK<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Mark Ruffalo (@MarkRuffalo) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/MarkRuffalo\/status\/1316747610422730755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 15, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3><b>What will change? EEB welcomes:<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, the most toxic chemicals will be progressively banned from consumer products. Any substance that causes cancer, genetic mutation, affects the reproductive or the endocrine system, has persistent or bioaccumulative properties as well as chemicals affecting the immune, neurological or respiratory systems and chemicals toxic to a specific organ properties will no longer be allowed in products such as food packaging, toys, childcare products, cosmetics, detergents, furniture and textiles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Faster action promised on worrisome endocrine disrupting chemicals, following a pledge from <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=COM:1999:0706:FIN\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1999<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. A ban on PFAS, a \u2018forever chemicals\u2019 threat to drinking water now present in almost all living creatures on the planet.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Acknowledgement that safety and environmental sustainability is the future for European industry. Practically speaking, this promises to flip the focus of EU legislation away from \u2018safe\u2019 use of harmful chemicals we see today to avoiding their use in the first place. There will also be support for a transition towards safer and greener substances and technologies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Greatly increased checks on chemical safety and \u201czero tolerance for non-compliance\u201d, meaning access to market chemicals revoked if found non-compliant. Today, vast numbers are <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eeb.org\/named-major-brands-breaking-eu-chemical-safety-law\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">non-compliant<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Clean recycling as a rule. Important to counter the growing volumes of harmful chemicals building up in waste streams and ending up back in products. A powerful new product policy will block harmful chemicals in products at creation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A stop to exports of chemicals that are banned but still made and exported from Europe.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>EEB regrets:<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There is no absolute target to reduce chemical production, despite massive predicted growth, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/info\/law\/better-regulation\/have-your-say\/initiatives\/12264-Chemicals-strategy-for-sustainability-\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">most of it toxic<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The polluters still won\u2019t pay. NGOs fear large amounts of public money will go to industry to shift to safer chemical production, while there will still be no tax on the use of harmful substances or fees to monitor pollution or clean polluted environments and drinking water. The public would never pay to stop dangerous drivers on the road when the law can achieve a public good for free. The public pays billions of Euros in health costs while the chemical industry is owned by some of Europe\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jim_Ratcliffe\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">richest<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and most <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/ngos-cry-foul-on-deza-chemical-company-linked-to-czech-prime-minister-andrej-babis-echa\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">politically powerful<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> men.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Paralysis by analysis is an industry tactic <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3490543\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">pioneered<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by big tobacco lobbyists. Industry has successfully won a blanket requirement for impact assessments in all EU legislation. This will effectively smother all areas of the chemical strategy, introducing delays typically lasting at least a year. The Commission has committed to complete delivery of the chemical strategy by 2024. This means the strategy might achieve nothing by 2024.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workers have been <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.leparisien.fr\/environnement\/produits-chimiques-toxiques-objectif-zero-pollution-en-europe-en-2030-14-10-2020-8402391.php\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">largely ignored<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> today, despite the fact cancer is the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etui.org\/Topics\/Health-Safety-working-conditions\/Occupational-cancers\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">leading cause<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of work-related death and most are caused by just <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etui.org\/Publications2\/Working-Papers\/Eliminating-occupational-cancer-in-Europe-and-globally\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">10 substances<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No clear measures against dodgy data. Industry selects which toxicity data for their products are given to regulators and often reject studies published by independent scientists that show harm. Regulators agreed independent data is a priority in the summer, but we saw no progress today.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Micro action on nanomaterials. Despite these substances having intrinsically unstable and concerning properties, we will remain largely blind about which nanomaterials, where and how much they are used. All EU institutions call for change, but the Commission follows an industry demand to \u2018go-slow\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Major reforms could rapidly reduce chemical pollution &nbsp; NGOs welcome action on \u201cserious and growing\u201d threat &nbsp; Ban for PFAS, the ever-lasting poison in drinking water<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":90,"featured_media":92223,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[130,682,4],"tags":[573,516,493],"class_list":["post-102565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chemicals","category-pfas","category-press-release","tag-chemicals-strategy","tag-eu-green-deal","tag-european-commission"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Chemicals-2-web.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/90"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102565\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eeb.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}